Unmanned Aircraft Flight Tests Begin at NASA Armstrong
NASA initiated a series of flight tests back in 2012 to assist the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as they develop regulations to allow the integration of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) into the National Airspace System (NAS).
Flash forward to today, the team has begun its final series of test flights for the project, known as Flight Test Series 6 (FT6), at NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center in California. The UAS Integration in the NAS project is managing the three-monthlong flight tests that are scheduled between September and November 2019.
FT6 will focus on low size weight and power (SWaP) sensors for Detect and Avoid (DAA) operations in controlled airspace to inform the FAA through the RTCA Special Committee DAA Working Group on the phase 2 minimum operational performance standards for DAA and air-to-air radar.
FT6 will use the TigerShark Block 3 XP, a NAVMAR Applied Sciences Corporation (NASC), Group 3 UAS with a wingspan of 21.9 feet for the final test series. The TigerShark features a payload capacity of 95 lbs. and a maximum endurance of 12 hours.
NASC personnel traveled across the country to deliver the TigerShark with a Mobile Operations Center, which includes the ground cockpit, to Armstrong May 6 from their facility in Pennsylvania.
The TigerShark XP has been modified with a unique smoke system to help intruder aircrew visually acquire the aircraft during flight tests and a nose structure to integrate Honeywell’s radar system. The Digital Active Phased Array, or DAPA-Lite radar system, is a new technology compared to previous flight series.
The state-of-the-art radar system consists of three small radar panels whose radar beams can be electronically steered to point in different directions without the need of moving antennas. The three panels are arranged to provide a wide horizontal field of view.
“The radar system is cutting-edge technology with panels small enough to be carried on a smaller UAS, but still have enough range to see and avoid other aircraft,” said FT6 DAA Principal Investigator Michael Vincent. “Our goal for FT6 is to challenge the effectiveness of our DAA system and Honeywell’s radar system as we develop performance standards of unmanned aircraft being integrated in our national airspace system.”
A primary objective for the project team is to characterize Honeywell’s DAPA-Lite radar to determine its effectiveness and its range and accuracy. The team will be testing what the radar can actually detect with its low size weight and power radar system. The DAPA-Lite radar will provide the data to the DAA system to determine the distance, bearing and elevation between the UAS and other aircraft. The DAA system will then use the information from the radar system to determine which flight path to take to maintain safe separation.
FT6 will help establish the minimum operational performance standards for DAA systems for UAS in the NAS. The system must alert the pilot in a timely manner when a conflict occurs and determine which display elements the pilot needs to be aware of in order to guide the TigerShark away from potential danger.
Three intruders will be used during the flight tests each representing a different common size aircraft that a UAS may encounter in the NAS, the King Air B200, T-34C and TG-14 Motor Glider.
Some flight tests will require an intruder aircraft to fly on the same path head-on toward the TigerShark with a safety separation buffer. This particular encounter will demonstrate the effectiveness of the DAA alerting system and what type of guidance it will recommend to avoid the intruder.
The flight series includes 150 encounters in 26 flights, which consists of six radar characterization flights, 12 DAA scripted encounter flights and eight full mission encounter flights.
Each full mission encounter flight will feature a different pilot that is naïve to the FT6 objectives and encounters to gather accurate data on how a pilot will react and respond to the systems. Pilots will fly a simulated UAS mission and interact with an air traffic controller and other traffic (live and virtual) in the airspace. The pilot will be tasked with using the DAA system to avoid live aircraft that the DAPA-Lite radar detects.
“Every decision we have made for FT6 was a result of what we have learned in previous flight tests,” added Vincent. “Our journey through each flight test series has been instrumental in the hopes of allowing unmanned aircraft to enter unsegregated airspace in the near future. FT6 will be a big factor on how we can safely integrate unmanned aircraft.”
NASA’s participation includes Armstrong, and researchers from Ames Research Center in California, and Langley Research Center in Virginia.
Elvia Valenzuela NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center
Acoustic Engineering involves multiple technical disciplines directed towards the goal of detecting underwater acoustic phenomena, primarily in support of the US Navy. NASC’s Advanced Acoustics Sector engineers have decades of experience in every aspect of system development, from environmental research and oceanographic system design to materials research and signal processor design. NASC incorporates advanced technology and innovative concepts to design increasingly complex systems. We have all the tools required to develop these systems, including oceanographic and acoustic modeling, FEA stress and vibration analysis tools, electronic circuit board design, acoustic calibrators, open water test facilities and signal processing development software.
These capabilities have been successfully utilized in the development of many advanced systems. We have developed a compact autonomous underwater vehicle. We have developed an air launch system to provide improved sensor location accuracy following air launch. We have developed improved active and passive transducer systems, providing improved performance in smaller packages. We have developed self-deploying underwater mechanical structures which form the framework for large arrays of transducers. We have developed miniature electronics which enable us to collect data from a large number of individual acoustic sensors deployed as a large aperture array. Our design and fabrication team have both the experience and the tools to provide solutions to our customer’s undersea challenges.
Peter Ulrich, Advanced Acoustics Project Manager
1418
Aero-Mechanical Engineering
Aerodynamic performance of our UAV products is critical to satisfying customer requirements. We address all aspects of flight performance, take-off roll-out, climb rate, cruise speed, maximum service ceiling, and endurance which are affected by lift, drag, and aircraft stability. We also address aircraft structural strength. This affects weight and assures that there is sufficient strength to accommodate the aircraft maneuvering flight profile. Additionally, we conduct structural tests to verify that our strength design goals are met.
To accommodate various payload configurations, we modify the aircraft fuselage as required, typically the nose. These modifications are supported by analysis to determine the impact on aircraft drag and stability. Our aerodynamic analysis tools help us design the most efficient shape to minimize the impact of drag and determine optimum center of gravity location so that aircraft stability is not affected by fuselage modification and payload configurations. We conduct Computational Fluid Dynamic analyses to improve the design of winglets, wings, and to analyze flow around propellers and engine inlets. We also conduct engine performance tests to determine thrust, fuel consumption, engine temperature, and acoustic output.
Carl Calianno, Director, Science & Technology
1414
Electrical Engineering
NASC Electrical Engineering aims to deliver the most elegant, cutting edge, and customer-driven solutions within the UAS industry. The scope of our work spans everything from component selection, power budgeting, and prototype development to test data collection, analysis, and fully integrated system testing. We regularly collaborate with the mechanical, software, and flight operations teams to continue to improve the performance and maintainability of the aircraft and ground control stations (GCS). In addition, configuration management is foundational to our engineering process as our vast product line is diverse and constantly improving. We push ourselves to deliver innovative and customized solutions in an effort to meet and exceed design requirements, which has successfully strengthened our relationships with customers.
John J. Lee, Electrical Engineer
1417
Avionics Engineering
The NASC avionics engineering design approach always starts with a very clear definition of the requirements and constraints. Once candidate avionics components are identified, we balance size, weight, and power requirements with cost, availability, and compatibility with other components that will form the overall system. Once the preliminary design is complete we hold the Preliminary Design Review and based on the outcome we complete the final design which must be approved at the Critical Design Review before being released for prototype fabrication or production, depending on the scope of the project. Our extensive experience over more than 10 years of integrating over 20 different payloads has made NASC the go-to UAS company for Group 3 unmanned aircraft systems.
Carl Engelbert, Vice President Airborne Systems Engineering and Production
1407
Flight Software Engineering
The NASC flight software development philosophy is simple – Make the pilot’s job as easy as possible by reducing steps it takes to do the job. We strive to automate processes and to reduce the required time to complete a given task. In this way, we allow the pilot to focus on the more mission-critical aspects of the flight. Having a solid relationship with the pilots is critical and we rely on their feedback to improve the software. Many times pilots have suggested and new feature or a change the way an existing system functions. We have been adept in implementing their recommendations and always allow them to evaluate the modifications to determine if they address the issue or functions as expected. Based on their testing further revisions are made until the desired result is achieved. This user-centric design methodology greatly reduces the time required to go from initial concept to deployment in the field.
James Tracey, UAS and Simulations Systems Software Developer
1408
Electro-Optic & RF Engineering
The NASC Electro-Optics (EO) Department is very responsive to sponsor/customer needs, identified as a new requirement for enhanced or newly established sensor performance. The design and application process involves an interaction with Mission Specialists, UAV Pilots and Data Analysts, to establish the optimum design of a sensor suite, in an effort to meet new requirements of a CONOPS. The EO department analyzes a customer’s mission need and develops an integrated sensor solution with microwave radar, turret based optical systems or a combination of both. Our services also provide the customer with custom-designed Ground Control Stations (GCS) responsible for processing imagery and data downloaded from the UAV via an RF communications link from the UAV platform.
Peter Raiti, Senior Electro-Optical Systems Engineer
1409
Mechanical Engineering
The NASC mechanical engineering design approach is similar to other disciplines in that we try to balance the pros and cons of weight, cost, availability, time, and strength. What may differentiate UAV design is the importance placed on weight and time – weight affects the overall endurance and every customer wants their product as soon as possible. We use readily available aviation grade metals, woods, and composites and apply Finite Element Analysis to design the lightest and strongest parts while leveraging 3D CAD design, and CFD software to reduce design cycle iterations and decrease the concept to production time. We strive to keep designs as simple as possible and avoid unnecessarily complicated components and improve manufacturability. We’ve also become very adept at designing composite materials like carbon fiber or fiberglass, which can provide unique and beautifully utilitarian designs.
Charles Lee, Senior Mechanical Engineer
1415
Communications Systems Engineering
“Systems engineering is roughly defined as the design and management of complex systems. This is especially true when applied to communications systems, ranging from waveform design through physical antenna systems, to cryptographic overlays for data protection. Navmar Applied Sciences Corporation (NASC) has years of experience in linking to unmanned systems, using both terrestrial and satellite-based communications systems. These system designs include all aspects of design, integration and test for both component and system level of performance requirements. At the System of Systems level, the radio and antenna systems must be integrated into their vehicles, blending dynamic antenna and environmental interactions into the developed performance models to assure that the mission is successful.
One of the key elements of systems engineering is the development of the specifications, assuring the correct reliability levels, and test procedures that will both assure mission performance and reliability, but not exceed both budgetary and schedule requirements.
Navmar Applied Sciences has developed all aspects of these systems over the years, from both static to dynamic beam forming antennas, antenna feeds and mounting systems all the way up to physically designing the waveform utilized of several military systems. Our engineering and production teams have both the experience and capability to provide just in time, cost effective solutions to difficult and challenging problems.”